This article is an explosion of not ordered ideas about Java, Node, JavaScript, explicitly typed and weak typed languages.
The root of evil, origins of JavaScript
JavaScript, not to be confused with Java, was created in 10 days in May 1995 by Brendan Eich, then working at Netscape
I don't remember the first release of Netscape browser with JavaScript, but I remember the reasons of JS introduction:
- Provide a simple scripting language "inspired on" Java to control embedded Java applets in web pages.
- A simple scripting language to control forms.
Later the public DOM representation of the page (partial initially), visible for JavaScript was introduced by Netscape, to provide some support of page changes driven by user actions beyond forms.
As you can see the initial motivation WAS NOT TO create a complete and powerful language to develop WEB CLIENT APPLICATIONS.
The JavaScript creators just were thinking on minor form manipulation (validations and similar), color changes and some texts added to the web page on user demand, no more than 100 lines of code (is an example).
Of course developers are ambitious, they want more and more, browsers could be more sophisticated and JavaScript could be improved... And yes it happened UNTIL Microsoft DESTROYED Netscape both the product and the company, MS Internet Explorer 5 won the browser war. Microsoft released later MSIE 6 AND FROZE the web technology for MANY years, being the browser the facto with no competition because the Netscape 4 (the loser) was a crap, with an enormous technical dept, the code was finally open sourced and the Mozilla Foundation was created to build the new generation of W3C compliant browsers (almost no code of the old Netscape was reused).
This reinvention took many years, meanwhile the absolute success of Windows XP + MSIE 6 and the lack of innovation of Microsoft in the web area, stalled the web technology including JavaScript, for many years, until Mozilla suite first, FireFox later, started to be popular (you know the rest of history). Today MSIE 8 (not very different to MSIE 6) still has a significative user market (yes really) and is probable this market share is greater in companies.
The browsers have been improved rendering pages and executing JS code, but JavaScript, the language, is mainly the same thanks to Microsoft.
JavaScript is as is as the result of lack of innovation, there is no "trascendental reason", there is no "deep thinking" about how to make a good language good enough for a long future, for instance the "prototype" feature just was a quick idea to create a mediocre object system, a mediocre version of Java and OOP , but good enough for a scripting language of the past.
The monothread asynchronous programming is more performant than a thread based
But the real facts do not agree, take a look Paul Tyma experiments, my own insights or the famous Tech Empower benchmarks, take a look how the venerable raw Java servlet blocking threads in I/O is performing, and the position of async I/O Java alternatives, of course Node is even in a lower position.
Java is tedious and verbose. Is programming with JavaScript quicker?
The optional generics Java type system is not an evil invent to make the life of Java developers more sad, is a tool to make your code more robust, the verbosity cost is backed with a better code, any Java developer understands that "List<User> hello" is a list of User (readability) and only can contain User objects (robust) in spite of the stupid variable name, is it bad?
Can you make big web applications in Node? Yes of course, everything is possible with effort and discipline (in weak typed languages the discipline must be "military" even more strict than a explicitly typed one), but in the long term a dynamic weak typed language becomes a nightmare in projects with a lot of code, even in projects with a single developer (is my experience).
The problem of argumentation based on inferiority complex
This is an example of the art of converting the limitation on feature, in spite of I'm a Java guy for many years (and a C++ guy before), Java marketing was not honest.
A Node instance has only one working thread, no concurrency problems, on the other hand, end developers are forced to execute ALL business logic of ALL concurrent users in the same single thread. This introduce a severe limitation, the problem of "CPU bound applications", your logic business must be very simple and quick otherwise all users will be stalled.
Related to the previous limitation, do you know the anecdote "Why npm's progress bar slows down install time by ~20%". The explanation is simple, the progress bar updating is time consuming and is executed in the main thread instead of starting a new thread. I'm sure it will be fixed maybe executing the log operation in an extension coded in C/C++ in a different thread or similar. This makes me think, are we in 1970? Are we coding on Windows 3.1/95 (the later with a crappy not preemptive thread system)?
In practice any Node application is multithread because blocking I/O operations are executed through a thread pool, whether the thread context switching is time costly, Node has the SAME problem that a thread per request pool.
Node is trying to sell us how good is lacking thread programming, "the missing feature is the best feature". Something similar happens in JavaScript space, the inherent lack of features to structure code (that is the lack of decent OOP support) is sold as "freedom" and simplification.
JavaScript is mediocre, period (ES6 is a step forward, it would be even better whether types were optional like in Dart). Do you like JavaScript/Node? Right, but formally is a mediocre language, hard to defend out side of the browser, Java is by far superior.
Is Java the best language OOP/functional of the world? Of course is NOT, in the OOP space I'm sure most people agree with me that Scala, Kotlin, Ceylon, typed Groovy or C# are SUPERIOR languages, no problem, and in no way is the best functional language.
"The language is not important, the developer is"
- A good surgeon is a good surgeon in a shelter tent and in a conventional operating room of a modern hospital. Try to ask him/her what is the best place for surgery...
- Can you do surgery with a kitchen knife? Yes you can but I'm sure you prefer a scalpel.
- Do you think a veterinary surgeon is appropriated to do surgery to humans?
The myth of complexity of concurrence management in "conventional" request-thread web apps
Node, JavaScript and foundation libraries
The same does not apply to Node, something so basic as a decent collection system (beyond the crazy native arrays of JavaScript) must be externally downloaded.
An explicit type system is not only to reduce the number of tests
Yes you know how useful is a good type system, if you do something wrong usually some other place is broken and the compiler advises you with no need of executing tests.
However an explicit type system provides more very important benefits:
- Readability: read the code of a Java class from a decent open source product, I'm sure you're going to understand the function of the class just reading the types.
- Robust code: MyClass obj only can reference MyClass objects or inherited from, List<MyClass> list is a list and only can contain objects of MyClass or inherited (a final class is also possible).
- Reliable code navigation: any decent Java IDE offers a "Find Usages" ("References" in Eclipse) feature, if you use this feature selecting "any" element of your code, the IDE is going to show with precision all uses of this element (an attribute, param, local variable, method, constructor, class name etc).
- Reliable code refactoring: any decent Java IDE offers many options for easy and secure refactoring for instance name changing (the simpler case, IDEs offer more complex refactoring options). Brutal refactorings can be performed with almost no risk.
Paradigms, paradigms, paradigms
In the end of the day the important characteristic of your preferred language is the paradigms supported, for instance, structured (ex. C), OOP, OOP+functional (Java, Scala...), pure functional (Lisp, Haskell, Closure...).
In Node/JS you can do OOP, but the approach is tedious and cumbersome.
I suspect in practice OOP is not mainstream in JavaScript, maybe "objects", I suspect mainstream JavaScript code is like a C with functions capturing context vars, or something similar to VisualBasic 6 pre .Net (had classes but not inheritance and polymorphism).
I'm not kidding, take a look this C like code of Mozilla based products (for instance FireFox).
The myth of inheritance abuse
Some people say that "people" usually abuse using inheritance, one reason for bashing OOP (the typical all or nothing argument, bad argument in my opinion).
I don't agree, in the real world is the contrary, many people inherits ONLY when there is no other option (when the API being used provides an abstract class or interface to implement) but rarely you are seeing fully user defined inheritance trees not forced by the frameworks. Of course this is personal vision and isn't scientifically backed.
Many people ignore how to model a class system including inheritance, encapsulation and polymorphism when appropriated, others maybe because are following the mantra of some "gurus" saying "the inheritance is bad".
A long time ago was OOP became popular many people abuse of inheritance trying to fit too many things in the same class tree, for instance a class User inherited with visual code, persistent code, networking etc. Fortunately that time is gone, however some people today invites to back to this old crazy approach because they don't like the modern layering/services approaches (and usually is the same people saying the inheritance is bad).
Fortunately good OOP developers use the inheritance (the complete OOP features in general) when needed.
Are you able to figure out?
- A Big Data tool made in Node.js:
Hadoop, HBase, Spark, Storm, Kafka, Cassandra, Kubernetes, docker? Most of Big Data tools are made in Java or a similar JVM lang (docker and Kubernetes are Go).
- Replacing Java Android core on top of C++ by Node.js
- A desktop application in Node.js
Has Node.js a reasonable place in the World?
Yes course, Node is useful for conventional web sites with small and relatively simple business code.
Oh yes some important parts of PayPal are built with Node, almost the public web site, Right, OK, however PayPal is a relatively easy service, yes really, PayPal is far far away of the enormous complexity of the Google, Amazon or Apple ecosystems. I remember the article about the "competition" of the options, Java and Node, for replacing the old C++ based tech of PayPal, I'm sure you know Node won.
In my opinion is quicker to make a simple spaghetti than a solid Java version, and as far I remember the Java developers tried to include every Java framework invented in SpringSource and GitHub (the competition was to make a quick prototype of a service, not a production service) and imported also the kitchen sink. Yes Node is fine in the short term, the LONG term is different... remember the case of Twitter and Ruby, I respect Ruby, Twitter is as is thanks to the flexibility of Ruby in the beginning before becoming the current monster, by the way, today based mainly on Java.
Epilogue
No, this is not the end, stay tuned for the next entry about Java and JavaScript, much more personal....
ENJOY!